One requirement (in some countries, it is by law) with digital signatures is that the signer signs what he sees, and only what he sees (that would be the integrity of appearance). This is why there is a Review function… allowing the signer to see what he signs.
The review function you get looks to me to be tied to the signature system used. And it appears that this function analyzes the document and finds items and feature which have a possibility to alter the document behind the user's back.
I guess that the form you review is a dynamic XFA form, and only a PDF because a PDF wrapper has been placed around it so that it can be viewed in Acrobat and Reader. Dynamic XFA forms can change their appearance when used, and that's why the integrity of appearance is NOT ensured with that type of forms. And being consequent, for using with digital signatures, such forms are not legal.
What this report essentially says is that it can not be guaranteed that the user really and only sees what he signs.
How to avoid this? Use a PDF form which can assure the integrity of appearance…
Hope this can help.
Max Wyss.